Dada LImba Waghamare vs Tarabai Ramesh Waghamare Advocate - Kshirsagar V.T. — 223/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section (). Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHST200013912020
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
441/2023
Filing Date
25-01-2016
Registration No
223/2023
Registration Date
28-01-2016
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Wai
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dada LImba Waghamare
Adv. Badave Y.A.
Respondent(s)
Tarabai Ramesh Waghamare Advocate - Kshirsagar V.T.
Rohini Sudarshan Oval
Prasad Prakash Nanaware
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 16-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 06-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 16-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 01-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The petition (Application No. 95) filed by the plaintiff seeking a "status quo" order to maintain the existing condition of a disputed property was dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff lacked standing to seek interim relief, as the property was legally purchased by Respondent No. 3 in 2010 with proper ownership and possession rights, and the plaintiff's claims of family property rights were not substantiated by the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The petition (Application No. 95) filed by the plaintiff seeking a "status quo" order to maintain the existing condition of a disputed property was dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff lacked standing to seek interim relief, as the property was legally purchased by Respondent No. 3 in 2010 with proper ownership and possession rights, and the plaintiff's claims of family property rights were not substantiated by the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts