Dada LImba Waghamare vs Tarabai Ramesh Waghamare Advocate - Kshirsagar V.T. — 223/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section (). Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHST200013912020
Filing Number
441/2023
Filing Date
25-Jan-2016
Registration No
223/2023
Registration Date
28-Jan-2016
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Wai
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dada LImba Waghamare
Adv. Badave Y.A.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tarabai Ramesh Waghamare Advocate - Kshirsagar V.T.
-
2.Rohini Sudarshan Oval
-
3.Prasad Prakash Nanaware
Case History
-
27-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
16-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
06-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
16-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Court Order Summary The petition (Application No. 95) filed by the plaintiff seeking a "status quo" order to maintain the existing condition of a disputed property was dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff lacked standing to seek interim relief, as the property was legally purchased by Respondent No. 3 in 2010 with proper ownership and possession rights, and the plaintiff's claims of family property rights were not substantiated by the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
01-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
01-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
01-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
19-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
17-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
03-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
24-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
17-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
03-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
10-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
12-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
08-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
18-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
21-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
02-May-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
04-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
21-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
14-Feb-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
13-Dec-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
08-Nov-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
27-Sep-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
13-Sep-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
03-Aug-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
26-Jul-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
14-Jun-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
15-Mar-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
05-Feb-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
09-Jan-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
07-Nov-2023
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
16-Oct-2023
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
14-Sep-2023
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
20-Jul-2023
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
22-Jun-2023
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
20-Apr-2023
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
23-Mar-2023
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
24-Feb-2023
Hearing
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
16-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jan-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 223/2023
Court Order Summary The petition (Application No. 95) filed by the plaintiff seeking a "status quo" order to maintain the existing condition of a disputed property was dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff lacked standing to seek interim relief, as the property was legally purchased by Respondent No. 3 in 2010 with proper ownership and possession rights, and the plaintiff's claims of family property rights were not substantiated by the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts