Vijay Arvind Pore vs Chandrakant Laxman Nimbalkar — 198/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SpecificPerformancePossessionInjunction. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHST200012092020
Filing Number
372/2023
Filing Date
13-Jul-2011
Registration No
198/2023
Registration Date
15-Jul-2011
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Wai
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vijay Arvind Pore
Adv. Yadav R.R
-
2.Madan Arvind Pore
Adv. Yadav R.R
-
3.Vinay Arvind Pore
Adv. Yadav R.R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chandrakant Laxman Nimbalkar
-
2.Jayawant Suryakant Pawar
Adv. Shaikh A.A
-
3.Sushila Bhagwan Ahirekar
Case History
-
07-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
13-Mar-2026
EvidenceView PDF
Summary: This is a Special Civil Suit No. 198/2023 (Section 95 CPC) in which the court recorded the cross-examination of Defendants 4 and 5's witness. The witness denied most allegations made by Plaintiffs 1-3, stating he had limited personal knowledge about the property in question, the defendants' residence, property boundaries, and various transactions allegedly involving Jayant Pawar. The court found the witness testimony largely lacked credibility regarding the key factual disputes, ultimately rejecting his testimony as unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
27-Feb-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
12-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
12-Jan-2026
Compliance
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
24-Nov-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
10-Nov-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
13-Oct-2025
Defence Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
17-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
08-May-2025
—
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
25-Apr-2025
—
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
28-Mar-2025
—
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
-
28-Feb-2025
—
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
24-Jan-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
17-Dec-2024
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
28-Nov-2024
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
05-Sep-2024
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
18-Jul-2024
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
02-Jul-2024
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
29-Apr-2024
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
17-Feb-2024
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
28-Nov-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
28-Nov-2023
Stayed by Honble High Court
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
24-Nov-2023
Stayed by Honble High Court
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
20-Oct-2023
Stayed by Honble High Court
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
12-Sep-2023
Stayed by Honble High Court
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
07-Aug-2023
Stayed by Honble High Court
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
23-Jun-2023
Stayed by Honble High Court
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
24-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jul-2011
Case filed
Registration No. 198/2023
Summary: This is a Special Civil Suit No. 198/2023 (Section 95 CPC) in which the court recorded the cross-examination of Defendants 4 and 5's witness. The witness denied most allegations made by Plaintiffs 1-3, stating he had limited personal knowledge about the property in question, the defendants' residence, property boundaries, and various transactions allegedly involving Jayant Pawar. The court found the witness testimony largely lacked credibility regarding the key factual disputes, ultimately rejecting his testimony as unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts