Vijay Arvind Pore vs Chandrakant Laxman Nimbalkar — 198/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SpecificPerformancePossessionInjunction. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHST200012092020

Defence Evidence

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

Filing Number

372/2023

Filing Date

13-07-2011

Registration No

198/2023

Registration Date

15-07-2011

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Wai

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section SpecificPerformancePossessionInjunction

Petitioner(s)

Vijay Arvind Pore

Adv. Yadav R.R

Madan Arvind Pore

Adv. Yadav R.R

Vinay Arvind Pore

Adv. Yadav R.R

Respondent(s)

Chandrakant Laxman Nimbalkar

Jayawant Suryakant Pawar

Adv. Shaikh A.A

Sushila Bhagwan Ahirekar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

23-03-2026

Defence Evidence

13-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

06-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

27-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

03-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

27-02-2026
Evidence
13-03-2026
Evidence

Summary: This is a Special Civil Suit No. 198/2023 (Section 95 CPC) in which the court recorded the cross-examination of Defendants 4 and 5's witness. The witness denied most allegations made by Plaintiffs 1-3, stating he had limited personal knowledge about the property in question, the defendants' residence, property boundaries, and various transactions allegedly involving Jayant Pawar. The court found the witness testimony largely lacked credibility regarding the key factual disputes, ultimately rejecting his testimony as unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a Special Civil Suit No. 198/2023 (Section 95 CPC) in which the court recorded the cross-examination of Defendants 4 and 5's witness. The witness denied most allegations made by Plaintiffs 1-3, stating he had limited personal knowledge about the property in question, the defendants' residence, property boundaries, and various transactions allegedly involving Jayant Pawar. The court found the witness testimony largely lacked credibility regarding the key factual disputes, ultimately rejecting his testimony as unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Wai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case