Vijay Arvind Pore vs Chandrakant Laxman Nimbalkar — 198/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SpecificPerformancePossessionInjunction. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHST200012092020
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
372/2023
Filing Date
13-07-2011
Registration No
198/2023
Registration Date
15-07-2011
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Wai
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vijay Arvind Pore
Adv. Yadav R.R
Madan Arvind Pore
Adv. Yadav R.R
Vinay Arvind Pore
Adv. Yadav R.R
Respondent(s)
Chandrakant Laxman Nimbalkar
Jayawant Suryakant Pawar
Adv. Shaikh A.A
Sushila Bhagwan Ahirekar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
Defence Evidence
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a Special Civil Suit No. 198/2023 (Section 95 CPC) in which the court recorded the cross-examination of Defendants 4 and 5's witness. The witness denied most allegations made by Plaintiffs 1-3, stating he had limited personal knowledge about the property in question, the defendants' residence, property boundaries, and various transactions allegedly involving Jayant Pawar. The court found the witness testimony largely lacked credibility regarding the key factual disputes, ultimately rejecting his testimony as unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a Special Civil Suit No. 198/2023 (Section 95 CPC) in which the court recorded the cross-examination of Defendants 4 and 5's witness. The witness denied most allegations made by Plaintiffs 1-3, stating he had limited personal knowledge about the property in question, the defendants' residence, property boundaries, and various transactions allegedly involving Jayant Pawar. The court found the witness testimony largely lacked credibility regarding the key factual disputes, ultimately rejecting his testimony as unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts