Ravindra Govind Telkar vs Subhash Kantilal Shaha Advocate - Jagdale A.N. — 196/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Saledeed. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHST200011932020
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
Filing Number
367/2023
Filing Date
18-03-2011
Registration No
196/2023
Registration Date
24-03-2011
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Wai
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ravindra Govind Telkar
Adv. Shevade Chaitanya Laxman
Respondent(s)
Subhash Kantilal Shaha Advocate - Jagdale A.N.
Rajendra Kantilal Shah
Arvind Kantilal Shaha
Kusum Kantilal Shaha
Jayshri Prakash Shah
Vidhya Suresh Shaha
Amol arvind shaha
Ajay arvind shaha
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 17-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 20-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 23-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Allowed: The plaintiff's petition for specific performance of a property sale agreement was granted. The court ordered the defendants to execute the sale deed for the property (Plot No. 135) within three months, finding that the plaintiff fulfilled contractual obligations while defendants breached the agreement by refusing to complete the sale after receiving earnest money. The defendants were also ordered to pay Rs. 500 as costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Allowed: The plaintiff's petition for specific performance of a property sale agreement was granted. The court ordered the defendants to execute the sale deed for the property (Plot No. 135) within three months, finding that the plaintiff fulfilled contractual obligations while defendants breached the agreement by refusing to complete the sale after receiving earnest money. The defendants were also ordered to pay Rs. 500 as costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts