Mangal Poonamchand Parmar vs Santosh Narayan Parte Advocate - Wadikar N.M. — 183/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section (). Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHST200011012020

Filing Number

343/2023

Filing Date

19-Aug-2022

Registration No

183/2023

Registration Date

22-Aug-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Wai

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ()

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mangal Poonamchand Parmar

    Adv. Shinde M.Y

  2. 2.Jaiesh Poonamchand Parmar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Narayan Parte Advocate - Wadikar N.M.

  2. 2.Anjana Rajendra Parte

  3. 3.Pranav Rajendra Parte

  4. 4.Yojana Rajesh Parte

  5. 5.Rajesh Nathuram Parte

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  5. 05-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  7. 17-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  8. 12-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  9. 08-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  10. 18-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  11. 27-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  12. 20-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  13. 09-Jun-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court rejected the defendants' application seeking to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court held that the limitation issue—whether the suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement dated 29.11.2013 is time-barred—is a mixed question of fact and law requiring evidence to be decided, and therefore cannot be determined at the threshold stage. The application was rejected with no costs imposed, allowing the suit to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 09-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  15. 25-Apr-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  16. 11-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  17. 29-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  18. 29-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  19. 28-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

  20. 28-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  21. 24-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  22. 29-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  23. 08-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  24. 13-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  25. 26-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  26. 21-Jun-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  27. 09-May-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  28. 03-May-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  29. 12-Apr-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  30. 22-Mar-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  31. 05-Mar-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  32. 29-Feb-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  33. 12-Feb-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  34. 29-Jan-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  35. 08-Jan-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  36. 18-Dec-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  37. 04-Dec-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  38. 20-Nov-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  39. 26-Oct-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  40. 05-Oct-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  41. 15-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  42. 24-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  43. 18-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  44. 21-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  45. 27-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  46. 03-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 19-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 183/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the defendants' application seeking to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court held that the limitation issue—whether the suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement dated 29.11.2013 is time-barred—is a mixed question of fact and law requiring evidence to be decided, and therefore cannot be determined at the threshold stage. The application was rejected with no costs imposed, allowing the suit to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case