Mangal Poonamchand Parmar vs Santosh Narayan Parte Advocate - Wadikar N.M. — 183/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section (). Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHST200011012020
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
343/2023
Filing Date
19-08-2022
Registration No
183/2023
Registration Date
22-08-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Wai
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mangal Poonamchand Parmar
Adv. Shinde M.Y
Jaiesh Poonamchand Parmar
Respondent(s)
Santosh Narayan Parte Advocate - Wadikar N.M.
Anjana Rajendra Parte
Pranav Rajendra Parte
Yojana Rajesh Parte
Rajesh Nathuram Parte
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 09-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 05-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 14-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the defendants' application seeking to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court held that the limitation issue—whether the suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement dated 29.11.2013 is time-barred—is a mixed question of fact and law requiring evidence to be decided, and therefore cannot be determined at the threshold stage. The application was rejected with no costs imposed, allowing the suit to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the defendants' application seeking to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court held that the limitation issue—whether the suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement dated 29.11.2013 is time-barred—is a mixed question of fact and law requiring evidence to be decided, and therefore cannot be determined at the threshold stage. The application was rejected with no costs imposed, allowing the suit to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts