Shanta Dinkar Mandhare vs Vanita Janardan Mandhare — 13/2025
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 372. Disposed: Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED on 09th March 2026.
Civil M.A.
CNR: MHST200005292025
e-Filing Number
25-09-2025
Filing Number
881/2025
Filing Date
26-09-2025
Registration No
13/2025
Registration Date
26-09-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Wai
Judge
1-Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shanta Dinkar Mandhare
Adv. Ravindra Patil
Respondent(s)
Vanita Janardan Mandhare
Anushka Janardan Mandhare
General Manager Tata Power Comp
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 31-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 23-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Wai Civil Judge rejected the respondents' application to reject the succession certificate plea under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, finding the mother's (applicant's) claim discloses a valid cause of action as a Class-I heir seeking service benefits. However, the court held it lacks territorial jurisdiction since the deceased ordinarily resided in Mumbai, where all related assets and employment were located, not in Wai's jurisdiction under Section 371 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The application was returned to the applicant for presentation before the competent Mumbai court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Wai Civil Judge rejected the respondents' application to reject the succession certificate plea under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, finding the mother's (applicant's) claim discloses a valid cause of action as a Class-I heir seeking service benefits. However, the court held it lacks territorial jurisdiction since the deceased ordinarily resided in Mumbai, where all related assets and employment were located, not in Wai's jurisdiction under Section 371 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The application was returned to the applicant for presentation before the competent Mumbai court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts