Shanta Dinkar Mandhare vs Vanita Janardan Mandhare — 13/2025

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 372. Disposed: Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A.

CNR: MHST200005292025

e-Filing Number

25-09-2025

Filing Number

881/2025

Filing Date

26-Sep-2025

Registration No

13/2025

Registration Date

26-Sep-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Wai

Judge

1-Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shanta Dinkar Mandhare

    Adv. Ravindra Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vanita Janardan Mandhare

  2. 2.Anushka Janardan Mandhare

  3. 3.General Manager Tata Power Comp

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The Wai Civil Judge rejected the respondents' application to reject the succession certificate plea under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, finding the mother's (applicant's) claim discloses a valid cause of action as a Class-I heir seeking service benefits. However, the court held it lacks territorial jurisdiction since the deceased ordinarily resided in Mumbai, where all related assets and employment were located, not in Wai's jurisdiction under Section 371 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The application was returned to the applicant for presentation before the competent Mumbai court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  9. 03-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  10. 24-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  12. 28-Nov-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  13. 17-Oct-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

  14. 26-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 26-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Wai Civil Judge rejected the respondents' application to reject the succession certificate plea under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, finding the mother's (applicant's) claim discloses a valid cause of action as a Class-I heir seeking service benefits. However, the court held it lacks territorial jurisdiction since the deceased ordinarily resided in Mumbai, where all related assets and employment were located, not in Wai's jurisdiction under Section 371 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The application was returned to the applicant for presentation before the competent Mumbai court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case