Shanta Dinkar Mandhare vs Vanita Janardan Mandhare — 13/2025

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 372. Disposed: Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED on 09th March 2026.

Civil M.A.

CNR: MHST200005292025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-09-2025

Filing Number

881/2025

Filing Date

26-09-2025

Registration No

13/2025

Registration Date

26-09-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Wai

Judge

1-Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 372

Petitioner(s)

Shanta Dinkar Mandhare

Adv. Ravindra Patil

Respondent(s)

Vanita Janardan Mandhare

Anushka Janardan Mandhare

General Manager Tata Power Comp

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai

09-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Order on Exh

13-02-2026

Order on Exh

31-01-2026

Order on Exh

23-01-2026

Order on Exh

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The Wai Civil Judge rejected the respondents' application to reject the succession certificate plea under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, finding the mother's (applicant's) claim discloses a valid cause of action as a Class-I heir seeking service benefits. However, the court held it lacks territorial jurisdiction since the deceased ordinarily resided in Mumbai, where all related assets and employment were located, not in Wai's jurisdiction under Section 371 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The application was returned to the applicant for presentation before the competent Mumbai court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Wai Civil Judge rejected the respondents' application to reject the succession certificate plea under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, finding the mother's (applicant's) claim discloses a valid cause of action as a Class-I heir seeking service benefits. However, the court held it lacks territorial jurisdiction since the deceased ordinarily resided in Mumbai, where all related assets and employment were located, not in Wai's jurisdiction under Section 371 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The application was returned to the applicant for presentation before the competent Mumbai court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Wai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case