Uttam Anna Shelake vs The Competent Authority and Special Land Acquisition Officer No 16 Satara — 185/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section (). Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
Spl .Dkst
CNR: MHST190055852023
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
1258/2023
Filing Date
20-08-2022
Registration No
185/2023
Registration Date
25-08-2022
Court
Additional District Court,Wai
Judge
1-District Judge-1, Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Uttam Anna Shelake
Adv. Rokade Manisha Kashinath
Respondent(s)
The Competent Authority and Special Land Acquisition Officer No 16 Satara
Indian National Highway of India
Adv. Gimawekar C.V
Amol Shankar Shelake
Raju Laxman Shelake
Suresh Laxman Shelke
Ashwini Dinkar Shelke
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1, Wai
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Order on Exh
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 06-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 05-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 21-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Special Darkhast Application No. 185 of 2023 filed by the National Highway Authority of India (judgment-debtor) seeking to prevent/postpone warrant issuance for 15 days has been rejected. The court found that the conditional stay order dated 01.04.2024 required 50% compensation deposit within two months, which was admittedly not complied with by the judgment-debtor, and no representative appeared for the judgment-debtor during hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Special Darkhast Application No. 185 of 2023 filed by the National Highway Authority of India (judgment-debtor) seeking to prevent/postpone warrant issuance for 15 days has been rejected. The court found that the conditional stay order dated 01.04.2024 required 50% compensation deposit within two months, which was admittedly not complied with by the judgment-debtor, and no representative appeared for the judgment-debtor during hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts