Sunderdas Raghunath Dhyagude vs The Competent Authority and Special Land Acquisition Officer No 16 Satara — 180/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Spl .Dkst

CNR: MHST190055752023

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

Filing Number

1253/2023

Filing Date

05-08-2022

Registration No

180/2023

Registration Date

25-08-2022

Court

Additional District Court,Wai

Judge

1-District Judge-1, Wai

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21

Petitioner(s)

Sunderdas Raghunath Dhyagude

Adv. Rokade Manisha Kashinath

Respondent(s)

The Competent Authority and Special Land Acquisition Officer No 16 Satara

Indian National Highway of India

Adv. Gimawekar C.V

Kalawati Raghunath Dhaygude

Kanchan Uttam Gophane

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1, Wai

23-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

13-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

06-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

05-03-2026

Order on Exh

21-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Interim Orders

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The National Highway Authority of India's application seeking to delay warrant issuance for 15 days was rejected by the District Judge on 13.03.2026. The court found that NHAI failed to comply with the conditional stay order dated 01.04.2024, which required depositing 50% compensation with accrued interest within two months, and no further compliance was made. NHAI's advocate's absence during proceedings further contributed to the rejection of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The National Highway Authority of India's application seeking to delay warrant issuance for 15 days was rejected by the District Judge on 13.03.2026. The court found that NHAI failed to comply with the conditional stay order dated 01.04.2024, which required depositing 50% compensation with accrued interest within two months, and no further compliance was made. NHAI's advocate's absence during proceedings further contributed to the rejection of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District Court,Wai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case