Maharashtra State vs Mandarani Shivaji Dhamdhere — 2/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,409,420,34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
MAHA P.I.D. 1999.
CNR: MHST190043492023
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
532/2023
Filing Date
29-06-2019
Registration No
2/2023
Registration Date
06-08-2019
Court
Additional District Court,Wai
Judge
1-District Judge-1, Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maharashtra State
Adv. DGP
Respondent(s)
Mandarani Shivaji Dhamdhere
Shivaji Tukaram Dhamdhere
Adv. Shinde M.Y
Kishor Devidas Bhosale
Vijay Shankar Thorat
Ashok Tukaram Dhamdhere
Ashvini Ashok Dhamdhere
Jaya @ Yashoda Bandu Charan
Tukaram Baburao Dhamdhere
Aslam Hanif Shaikh
Pradip Muktaji Bansode
Dattatray Bharat Londhe
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1, Wai
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 26-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 24-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 21-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary The bail application of Mandarani Shivaji Dhamdhere and Shivaji Tukaram Dhamdhere under Section 436-A CrPC has been rejected by the Special Court, Wai. The court found that both accused were previously convicted in related MPID Act and IPC cases and deliberately suppressed these convictions in their bail plea; additionally, they face serious charges including alleged defalcation of Rs. 1,02,94,470, making them ineligible for bail under Section 436 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The bail application of Mandarani Shivaji Dhamdhere and Shivaji Tukaram Dhamdhere under Section 436-A CrPC has been rejected by the Special Court, Wai. The court found that both accused were previously convicted in related MPID Act and IPC cases and deliberately suppressed these convictions in their bail plea; additionally, they face serious charges including alleged defalcation of Rs. 1,02,94,470, making them ineligible for bail under Section 436 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts