Maharashtra State vs Shivaji Tukaram Dhamdhere Advocate - Patil V.B. — 45/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,409. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

Spl.Case

CNR: MHST190008732023

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Next Hearing

01st April 2026

Filing Number

66/2023

Filing Date

14-02-2022

Registration No

45/2023

Registration Date

14-02-2022

Court

Additional District Court,Wai

Judge

1-District Judge-1, Wai

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,409
Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

Maharashtra State

Adv. AGP

Respondent(s)

Shivaji Tukaram Dhamdhere Advocate - Patil V.B.

Mandarani Shivaji Dhamdhere

Adv. Patil V.B.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1, Wai

17-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

06-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

26-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

24-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

21-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Interim Orders

26-11-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary Bail Denied for Mandarani Shivaji Dhamdhere and Shivaji Tukaram Dhamdhere in Special MPID Case No. 45/2023. The court rejected their bail application under Section 436-A CrPC, finding that Section 409 IPC prescribes life imprisonment as maximum punishment, the accused have prior convictions in similar financial crimes involving Rs. 1,02,94,470, multiple pending cases exist across courts, and material facts were deliberately suppressed in the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Bail Denied for Mandarani Shivaji Dhamdhere and Shivaji Tukaram Dhamdhere in Special MPID Case No. 45/2023. The court rejected their bail application under Section 436-A CrPC, finding that Section 409 IPC prescribes life imprisonment as maximum punishment, the accused have prior convictions in similar financial crimes involving Rs. 1,02,94,470, multiple pending cases exist across courts, and material facts were deliberately suppressed in the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District Court,Wai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case