Vikram Vasant Erande vs State of Maharashtra Through Panchgani Police Station Advocate - AGP One — 186/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln.

CNR: MHST190005482025

e-Filing Number

18-11-2025

Filing Number

343/2025

Filing Date

20-Nov-2025

Registration No

186/2025

Registration Date

20-Nov-2025

Court

Additional District Court,Wai

Judge

1-District Judge-1, Wai

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vikram Vasant Erande

    Adv. Amol Chikane

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Panchgani Police Station Advocate - AGP One

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court rejected Vikram Vasant Erande's pre-arrest bail application in a case involving serious charges of abduction, wrongful confinement, and organized crime under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that despite the applicant's claims of false implication, he was identifiable as one of the unknown perpetrators who allegedly abducted the informant by impersonating police officers, obtained a compromise deed under threats, and had suppressed multiple prior criminal convictions for bodily offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1, Wai

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge-1, Wai

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  6. 14-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  9. 05-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  11. 20-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  12. 13-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  13. 11-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  14. 06-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  15. 30-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  16. 27-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  17. 21-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  18. 17-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  19. 15-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  20. 09-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  21. 02-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  22. 29-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  23. 24-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  24. 19-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  25. 16-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  26. 12-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  27. 09-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  28. 05-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  29. 28-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  30. 27-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-1, Wai

  31. 21-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 20-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 186/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Vikram Vasant Erande's pre-arrest bail application in a case involving serious charges of abduction, wrongful confinement, and organized crime under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that despite the applicant's claims of false implication, he was identifiable as one of the unknown perpetrators who allegedly abducted the informant by impersonating police officers, obtained a compromise deed under threats, and had suppressed multiple prior criminal convictions for bodily offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case