Vikram Vasant Erande vs State of Maharashtra Through Panchgani Police Station Advocate - AGP One — 186/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHST190005482025
e-Filing Number
18-11-2025
Filing Number
343/2025
Filing Date
20-11-2025
Registration No
186/2025
Registration Date
20-11-2025
Court
Additional District Court,Wai
Judge
1-District Judge-1, Wai
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vikram Vasant Erande
Adv. Amol Chikane
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Panchgani Police Station Advocate - AGP One
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1, Wai
Disposed
Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Order |
| 14-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected Vikram Vasant Erande's pre-arrest bail application in a case involving serious charges of abduction, wrongful confinement, and organized crime under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that despite the applicant's claims of false implication, he was identifiable as one of the unknown perpetrators who allegedly abducted the informant by impersonating police officers, obtained a compromise deed under threats, and had suppressed multiple prior criminal convictions for bodily offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court rejected Vikram Vasant Erande's pre-arrest bail application in a case involving serious charges of abduction, wrongful confinement, and organized crime under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that despite the applicant's claims of false implication, he was identifiable as one of the unknown perpetrators who allegedly abducted the informant by impersonating police officers, obtained a compromise deed under threats, and had suppressed multiple prior criminal convictions for bodily offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts