Vishnu Uttam Suryavanshi vs State of Maharashtra Through Mahableshwar Police Station Advocate - AGP One — 34/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHST190001052026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2026
Filing Number
65/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
34/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
Additional District Court,Wai
Judge
1-District Judge-1, Wai
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vishnu Uttam Suryavanshi
Adv. Pradhunya Vijay Gadhave
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through Mahableshwar Police Station Advocate - AGP One
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court rejected the regular bail application of Vishnu Uttam Suryawanshi, accused of forging a power of attorney document of a deceased property owner to fraudulently execute a property sale deed. The court found the allegations serious and noted the applicant's criminal antecedents in cheating cases, his direct role as mastermind compared to co-accused witnesses, and the ongoing investigation, determining he does not deserve bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1, Wai
-
06-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-1, Wai
-
05-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-1, Wai
-
04-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-1, Wai
-
02-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-1, Wai
-
27-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-1, Wai
-
26-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-1, Wai
-
21-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-1, Wai
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge-1, Wai
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 34/2026
Summary: The court rejected the regular bail application of Vishnu Uttam Suryawanshi, accused of forging a power of attorney document of a deceased property owner to fraudulently execute a property sale deed. The court found the allegations serious and noted the applicant's criminal antecedents in cheating cases, his direct role as mastermind compared to co-accused witnesses, and the ongoing investigation, determining he does not deserve bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts