Tushar Balasaheb Tate vs State of Maharashtra Through Wai Police Station Advocate - AGP One — 31/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln.

CNR: MHST190000992026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

59/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

31/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

Additional District Court,Wai

Judge

1-District Judge-1, Wai

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

Tushar Balasaheb Tate

Adv. Sneha Ramesh Dound

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Wai Police Station Advocate - AGP One

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1, Wai

18-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Order

16-03-2026

Order

13-03-2026

Order

11-03-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Wai granted pre-arrest bail to Tushar Balasaheb Tate in a criminal case involving alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust (IPC Sections 420, 406). The court found no necessity for custodial interrogation, noting that most allegations targeted the co-accused, there was unexplained delay in lodging the FIR, the punishment is not life imprisonment, and the applicant demonstrated willingness to cooperate with investigation. Bail was granted on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 20,000 with standard conditions including non-tampering with witnesses and non-departure from India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Wai granted pre-arrest bail to Tushar Balasaheb Tate in a criminal case involving alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust (IPC Sections 420, 406). The court found no necessity for custodial interrogation, noting that most allegations targeted the co-accused, there was unexplained delay in lodging the FIR, the punishment is not life imprisonment, and the applicant demonstrated willingness to cooperate with investigation. Bail was granted on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 20,000 with standard conditions including non-tampering with witnesses and non-departure from India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District Court,Wai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case