Tushar Balasaheb Tate vs State of Maharashtra Through Wai Police Station Advocate - AGP One — 31/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHST190000992026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
59/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
31/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
Additional District Court,Wai
Judge
1-District Judge-1, Wai
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tushar Balasaheb Tate
Adv. Sneha Ramesh Dound
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Wai Police Station Advocate - AGP One
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1, Wai
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Order |
| 16-03-2026 | Order |
| 13-03-2026 | Order |
| 11-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Wai granted pre-arrest bail to Tushar Balasaheb Tate in a criminal case involving alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust (IPC Sections 420, 406). The court found no necessity for custodial interrogation, noting that most allegations targeted the co-accused, there was unexplained delay in lodging the FIR, the punishment is not life imprisonment, and the applicant demonstrated willingness to cooperate with investigation. Bail was granted on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 20,000 with standard conditions including non-tampering with witnesses and non-departure from India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Wai granted pre-arrest bail to Tushar Balasaheb Tate in a criminal case involving alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust (IPC Sections 420, 406). The court found no necessity for custodial interrogation, noting that most allegations targeted the co-accused, there was unexplained delay in lodging the FIR, the punishment is not life imprisonment, and the applicant demonstrated willingness to cooperate with investigation. Bail was granted on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 20,000 with standard conditions including non-tampering with witnesses and non-departure from India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts