Rushikesh Vijay Rananavare vs State of Maharashtra Through Shirval Police Station Advocate - AGP One — 30/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln.

CNR: MHST190000962026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

58/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

30/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

Additional District Court,Wai

Judge

1-District Judge-1, Wai

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Rushikesh Vijay Rananavare

Adv. Madhuri Gopinath Suryawanshi

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Shirval Police Station Advocate - AGP One

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1, Wai

18-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Order

16-03-2026

Order

13-03-2026

Order

11-03-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

SUMMARY: The Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Wai granted bail to Rushikesh Vijay Rananavare in connection with charges of attempt to commit murder and illegal firearms possession. The court found that while the accused participated in purchasing a pistol used in the attack, he had no direct role in the actual shooting, was not present at the incident scene, and had no prior criminal involvement. The court deemed it improper to keep the accused in custody indefinitely at the pre-trial stage based on his peripheral involvement. Bail was granted on a personal recognizance bond of ₹1,00,000 with standard conditions prohibiting tampering with evidence and contacting prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Wai granted bail to Rushikesh Vijay Rananavare in connection with charges of attempt to commit murder and illegal firearms possession. The court found that while the accused participated in purchasing a pistol used in the attack, he had no direct role in the actual shooting, was not present at the incident scene, and had no prior criminal involvement. The court deemed it improper to keep the accused in custody indefinitely at the pre-trial stage based on his peripheral involvement. Bail was granted on a personal recognizance bond of ₹1,00,000 with standard conditions prohibiting tampering with evidence and contacting prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District Court,Wai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case