Rushikesh Jagannath Malekar vs State of Maharashtra Through Shirval Police Station Advocate - AGP One — 19/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln.

CNR: MHST190000572026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

33/2026

Filing Date

29-01-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

29-01-2026

Court

Additional District Court,Wai

Judge

1-District Judge-1, Wai

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Rushikesh Jagannath Malekar

Adv. Amol Chikane

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Shirval Police Station Advocate - AGP One

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1, Wai

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Order

09-03-2026

Order

07-03-2026

Order

06-03-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Additional Sessions Judge at Wai rejected the bail application of Rushikesh Jagannath Malekar, accused of murder under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found the offense serious, with evidence including 17 external injuries on the victim, witness statements, CCTV footage placing the accused at the scene, and recovery of weapons per his disclosure statement, determining he did not deserve bail despite being in custody for 72 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge at Wai rejected the bail application of Rushikesh Jagannath Malekar, accused of murder under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found the offense serious, with evidence including 17 external injuries on the victim, witness statements, CCTV footage placing the accused at the scene, and recovery of weapons per his disclosure statement, determining he did not deserve bail despite being in custody for 72 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District Court,Wai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case