Keshav Arjun Phadtare vs Raghunath Mugutrao Chavan Advocate - Muley S.S — 88/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST180015862025
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2025
Filing Number
1589/2025
Filing Date
28-02-2025
Registration No
88/2025
Registration Date
06-03-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Vaduj
Judge
3-2nd Jt CJSD and Addl CJM Vaduj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Keshav Arjun Phadtare
Adv. Salunkhe V.R.
Tanaji Arjun Phadtare
Respondent(s)
Raghunath Mugutrao Chavan Advocate - Muley S.S
Hanmant Kashinath Chavan
Sudhakar Kashinath Chavan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt CJSD and Addl CJM Vaduj
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 03-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 03-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-12-2025 | Order on Exh |
| 03-12-2025 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The petition is allowed with partial relief. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 300 as costs to the respondent, after which the respondent must file their written reply/affidavit on the record within the stipulated time. The court found that the petitioner's delay in filing the written response required condonation, which was granted in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The petition is allowed with partial relief. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 300 as costs to the respondent, after which the respondent must file their written reply/affidavit on the record within the stipulated time. The court found that the petitioner's delay in filing the written response required condonation, which was granted in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts