Shrushti Sudhakar Mokle vs Popat Krushna Mokale Advocate - Suryavanshi A.H. — 307/2017
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,5,38. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST180006372016
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
318/2017
Filing Date
16-12-2017
Registration No
307/2017
Registration Date
19-12-2017
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Vaduj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shrushti Sudhakar Mokle
Adv. Ingale V.E.
Aditya Sudhakar Mokel
Trupati Sudhakar Mokel
Respondent(s)
Popat Krushna Mokale Advocate - Suryavanshi A.H.
Shindubai Krisana Mokal
Sudhakar Popat Mokal
Sandip Popat Mokal
Sunita Sanjay Kadete
Mukund Bhiku Nirale
Mhadev Bhiku Nirale
Shalini Shivaji Davane
Surekha Gajanan Kudale
Namdev Laxman Pawar
Satish Laxman Pawar
Shalan Laxman pawar
Sopan Danu Pawar
Chagdev Sawala Pawar
Udeav Bhart Pawar
Parvati Chandrkant Bagal
Nivruthi Dahanu Pawar
Chhaya Atul Gudage
Prakash Nivruthi Nalwade
Vithhal Abaji Gojari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 06-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 02-01-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for amendment of the plaint under Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure was allowed. The court permitted plaintiffs to insert the word "deceased" before the names of defendant nos. 1 and 3, and to reflect their legal representatives, as the suit is still in preliminary stages and no prejudice would be caused to defendants. Plaintiffs are directed to file the amended plaint copy by the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for amendment of the plaint under Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure was allowed. The court permitted plaintiffs to insert the word "deceased" before the names of defendant nos. 1 and 3, and to reflect their legal representatives, as the suit is still in preliminary stages and no prejudice would be caused to defendants. Plaintiffs are directed to file the amended plaint copy by the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts