Ramchandra Kaka Sawant vs Ganesh Prakash Chavan Advocate - N.L.Chavhan V.B.Jadhav — 128/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section saledeed. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHST180006222022

Filing Number

747/2022

Filing Date

07-Nov-2022

Registration No

128/2022

Registration Date

07-Nov-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Vaduj

Judge

1-Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section saledeed

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramchandra Kaka Sawant

    Adv. Karande P.D.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ganesh Prakash Chavan Advocate - N.L.Chavhan V.B.Jadhav

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  3. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  4. 19-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  5. 21-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  6. 07-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  7. 03-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  8. 22-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  9. 25-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  10. 09-May-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  11. 07-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  12. 24-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  13. 29-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  14. 11-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  15. 16-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  16. 19-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  17. 21-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  18. 26-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  19. 22-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  20. 09-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  21. 12-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  22. 15-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  23. 27-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  24. 15-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  25. 25-Aug-2023

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  26. 21-Jul-2023

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs in this property dispute case. The plaintiffs had paid Rs. 3,80,000 as earnest money under a notarized agreement to purchase agricultural land from the defendants for Rs. 8,00,000, but the defendants refused to execute and register the sale deed. Finding a prima facie case, balance of convenience in plaintiffs' favor, and risk of irreparable loss, the court ordered defendants to refrain from alienating the property until final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  27. 21-Jul-2023

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  28. 23-Jun-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  29. 23-Jun-2023

    Argument on Pre_Issues

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  30. 28-Apr-2023

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  31. 31-Mar-2023

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  32. 10-Mar-2023

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  33. 03-Feb-2023

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  34. 16-Dec-2022

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  35. 25-Nov-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  36. 25-Nov-2022

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj

  37. 07-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 07-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 128/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs in this property dispute case. The plaintiffs had paid Rs. 3,80,000 as earnest money under a notarized agreement to purchase agricultural land from the defendants for Rs. 8,00,000, but the defendants refused to execute and register the sale deed. Finding a prima facie case, balance of convenience in plaintiffs' favor, and risk of irreparable loss, the court ordered defendants to refrain from alienating the property until final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case