Ganpati Kasinath Maili Bansode vs The Collector Satara Advocate - Salunkhe V.R. — 350/2016
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST180002862016
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
282/2016
Filing Date
10-11-2016
Registration No
350/2016
Registration Date
10-11-2016
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Vaduj
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganpati Kasinath Maili Bansode
Adv. Matakar V S
Madhukar Ganpati Mali Bansode
Pandurang Ganpati Mali Bansode
Bajarang Ganpati Mali Bansode
Bapurao Ganpati Mali bansode
Gorakh Ganpati Mali Bansode
Respondent(s)
The Collector Satara Advocate - Salunkhe V.R.
Supdt DILR Satara
Assistant Supdt T ILR Vaduj Khatav
Tahsildar so Vaduj Khatav
Bhiku Sitaram Mali Bansode
Shankar Sitaram Mali Bansode
Shivling Bhiku Mali Bansode
Somnath Shankar Mali Bansode
Keshav Shankar Mali Bansode
Ramling Bhiku Mali Bansode
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 15-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary RCS No. 350/2016 | Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Vaduj | Order dated 23.09.2025 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application seeking to frame an additional issue regarding whether Defendant No.3 (Deputy Superintendent of Land Record) complied with a State Information Commissioner's order and is liable for disciplinary action. The court held that while it has jurisdiction over the main suit for declaration of ownership and mandatory injunction for land record correction, matters concerning disciplinary action against government officials fall outside civil court jurisdiction and must be pursued before the appropriate administrative authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary RCS No. 350/2016 | Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Vaduj | Order dated 23.09.2025 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application seeking to frame an additional issue regarding whether Defendant No.3 (Deputy Superintendent of Land Record) complied with a State Information Commissioner's order and is liable for disciplinary action. The court held that while it has jurisdiction over the main suit for declaration of ownership and mandatory injunction for land record correction, matters concerning disciplinary action against government officials fall outside civil court jurisdiction and must be pursued before the appropriate administrative authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts