Ashok Vithoba Kale vs Kamal Nana Kale — 85/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST180001252025
e-Filing Number
27-02-2025
Filing Number
128/2025
Filing Date
27-Feb-2025
Registration No
85/2025
Registration Date
01-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Vaduj
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ashok Vithoba Kale
-
2.Dattatraya Kashinath Garware
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kamal Nana Kale
-
2.Hanmant Shripati Dhole
-
3.Vijayakumar Jaisingh Jadhav
-
4.Jayprakash Jaisingh Jadhav
-
5.Suryakant Hanmant Dhole
-
6.Tahsiladar So.
-
7.Sub divisional officer So. Man-Khatav
Case History
-
24-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Compliance
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
30-Jan-2026
Compliance
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
09-Jan-2026
Compliance
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
05-Dec-2025
Steps_Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
12-Nov-2025
Steps_Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
20-Sep-2025
Steps_Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
18-Aug-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary Application Rejected. The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for appointment of an advocate as Court Commissioner to inspect disputed agricultural properties and determine the existence of a right-of-way. The court held that while a Court Commissioner appointment could serve the parties' purposes, an advocate lacks expertise in this field and a Tahsildar/Land Inspector (T.I.L.R) would be more appropriate for such inspection work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Aug-2025
Steps_Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
14-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
08-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
05-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
01-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
23-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
19-Jul-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
10-Jul-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
02-Apr-2025
Steps_Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
26-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
20-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
12-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
11-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
05-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
04-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
-
01-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 85/2025
Case Summary Application Rejected. The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for appointment of an advocate as Court Commissioner to inspect disputed agricultural properties and determine the existence of a right-of-way. The court held that while a Court Commissioner appointment could serve the parties' purposes, an advocate lacks expertise in this field and a Tahsildar/Land Inspector (T.I.L.R) would be more appropriate for such inspection work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts