Krushnt Vaman Pawar vs District Collector So., Satara — 23/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST180000332026
e-Filing Number
13-01-2026
Filing Number
33/2026
Filing Date
15-Jan-2026
Registration No
23/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Vaduj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Krushnt Vaman Pawar
Adv. Pawar A.N.
-
2.Mandakini Vaman Pawar
Adv. Pawar A.N.
-
3.shobha Gorakh Todkar
Adv. Pawar A.N.
-
4.Suvarna Mahadev Jadhav
-
5.Keshar Anna Pawar
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
6.Narayan Shivram Pawar
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
7.Subhash Shivram Pawar
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
8.Sudhakar Shivram Pawar
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
9.Dropada Namdev Mulik
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
10.Sindhu Lakshman Jadhav
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
11.Chhabutai Shankar Phadtare
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
12.Sangita Rajendra Salunkhe
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
13.Rahul Keshar Pawar
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
14.Dada Uttam Pawar
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
15.Sampat Uttam Pawar
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
16.Parubai Uttam Pawar
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
17.Sunita Nivrutti Jadhav
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
18.Sayaji Baba Pawar
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
19.Shahaji Baba Pawar
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
20.Anita Maruti Bagal
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
21.Ladubai Vasant Jadhav
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
22.Subhadra Baba Pawar
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
23.Nitin Rajendra Pawar
Adv. BG TODKAR
-
24.Surekha Rajendra Pawar
Adv. BG TODKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.District Collector So., Satara
-
2.Sub divisional officer So., Man - Khatav
-
3.Tahsiladar So., Khatav (Vaduj)
-
4.Ashok Shivaji Pawar
-
5.Balu Shivaji Pawar
-
6.Vijay Pandurang Pawar
-
7.Ravindra Pandurang Pawar
-
8.Dwarkabai Pandurang Pawar
-
9.Suman Shivaji Jadhav
-
10.Shankar Rau Pawar
-
11.Mamtabai Ganpat Thorave
-
12.Chingabai Mahadu Thorave
-
13.Dadaso Parsharam Pawar
-
14.Prashant Rajendra Pawar
Case History
-
30-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj
-
18-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary The Civil Judge rejected the application filed by defendants No. 4 and 5 under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC, which sought to return the plaint on grounds of non-compliance with Section 80 CPC's mandatory 60-day waiting period after notice to government officers. The court held that the plaintiffs had obtained prior court approval to waive the 60-day period under Section 80(2) CPC due to urgency, thereby making the suit maintainable despite being filed before the statutory period expired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj
-
09-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj
-
06-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj
-
05-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj
-
04-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj
-
02-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj
-
16-Feb-2026
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Sr.Dn., Vaduj
-
21-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 23/2026
Case Summary The Civil Judge rejected the application filed by defendants No. 4 and 5 under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC, which sought to return the plaint on grounds of non-compliance with Section 80 CPC's mandatory 60-day waiting period after notice to government officers. The court held that the plaintiffs had obtained prior court approval to waive the 60-day period under Section 80(2) CPC due to urgency, thereby making the suit maintainable despite being filed before the statutory period expired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts