Dadaso Pandurang Sartape vs Maruti Krushna Sawant etc 17 Advocate - Kapse V.V. — 28/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Injunction. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST180000122020
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
12/2020
Filing Date
27-01-2020
Registration No
28/2020
Registration Date
27-01-2020
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Vaduj
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dadaso Pandurang Sartape
Adv. Godse P.S.
Respondent(s)
Maruti Krushna Sawant etc 17 Advocate - Kapse V.V.
Anna Krushna Sawant
Bapurao Maruti Mane
Sukhadev Maruti Mane
Hanmant Maruti Mane
Shivaji Maruti Mane
Anna Maruti Mane
Machindra Kaka Sawant
Machindra Pandurang Sartape
Hindurao Pandurang Sartape
Tukaram Pandurang Sartape
Dnyandeo Pandurang Sartape
Collector So. Satara
Duyyam Nibandhak Dvitiy Shreni, Maharashtra through Dahivadi
Akaram Machindra Sawant
Ratnamala Machindra Sawant
Manisha Machindra Sawant
Sangita Machindra Sawant
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn. And Addl. C. J. M., Vaduj
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court partly allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction in this land dispute case. Defendants 1-8 and 15-18 are restrained from creating third-party interests over the ancestral property (4 hectares 11R in village Vaki, Satara) until suit disposal, as the plaintiff established a prima facie case of undivided share and irreparable loss. However, the plaintiff's request to restrain defendants from obstructing his possession was denied due to insufficient specific pleading of obstruction incidents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court partly allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction in this land dispute case. Defendants 1-8 and 15-18 are restrained from creating third-party interests over the ancestral property (4 hectares 11R in village Vaki, Satara) until suit disposal, as the plaintiff established a prima facie case of undivided share and irreparable loss. However, the plaintiff's request to restrain defendants from obstructing his possession was denied due to insufficient specific pleading of obstruction incidents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts