Maharashtra State vs Narayan Aawaba Mohite Advocate - Karande P.D. — 36/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,307,326,323,504,506,143,144,147,148,149,188,269. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHST170006882020
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
27592/2020
Filing Date
10-11-2020
Registration No
36/2020
Registration Date
10-11-2020
Court
District and Session Court, Vaduj
Judge
3-Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maharashtra State
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Narayan Aawaba Mohite Advocate - Karande P.D.
Aappaso Aawaba Mohite
Lalaso Aawaba Mohite
Aakash Narayan Mohite
Dattatraya Balku Mohite
Jyotiram Aappaso Mohite
Kiran Narayan Mohite
Sunil BalKu Mohite
Malhari Aappaso Mohite
Anil Balku Mohite
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 02-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 21-11-2025 | Hearing |
| 10-10-2025 | Hearing |
| 22-08-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Bail Granted. Accused Kiran Narayan Mohite was granted bail in Sessions Case No. 36/2020 (a violent clash case involving axes and sticks where one person died) on furnishing a Personal Recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties. The court found that while serious charges including murder (IPC §302) were alleged, the applicant's direct role was limited to allegedly striking one victim with an axe, and his involvement in murder charges depended entirely on proving unlawful assembly and common object—factual matters best determined at trial. Conditions include monthly police station reporting and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Bail Granted. Accused Kiran Narayan Mohite was granted bail in Sessions Case No. 36/2020 (a violent clash case involving axes and sticks where one person died) on furnishing a Personal Recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties. The court found that while serious charges including murder (IPC §302) were alleged, the applicant's direct role was limited to allegedly striking one victim with an axe, and his involvement in murder charges depended entirely on proving unlawful assembly and common object—factual matters best determined at trial. Conditions include monthly police station reporting and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts