Maharashtra State vs Dattatraya Ramchandra Jadhav Advocate - Hutgikar S. — 29/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,384,385,458,120-B,75,504,506,507. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHST170005542020
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
27494/2020
Filing Date
19-09-2020
Registration No
29/2020
Registration Date
19-09-2020
Court
District and Session Court, Vaduj
Judge
1-District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maharashtra State
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Dattatraya Ramchandra Jadhav Advocate - Hutgikar S.
Chandrakant Vishnu Sawant
Adv. Sakhare C.
Mangesh Chandrakant Sawant
Adv. Sakhare C.
Pradeep Dhondiram Ghadge
Adv. Hutgikar S.
Vijay @ Bhejya Bhalchandra Waghmare
Adv. Hutgikar S.
Khalya @ Krishna Hanmant Badekar
Adv. Hutgikar S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Bail Application Denied - The Special Court under MCOCA Act rejected the bail application of Dattatraya Ramchandra Jadhav (Case No. 29/2020) on August 14, 2024. The court found sufficient prima facie material that Jadhav, as head of an organized crime syndicate, participated in extortion, criminal intimidation, and threats against a complainant regarding a land dispute, and determined that no reasonable grounds existed to believe him innocent of the serious charges under IPC and MCOCA Act, 1999. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Bail Application Denied - The Special Court under MCOCA Act rejected the bail application of Dattatraya Ramchandra Jadhav (Case No. 29/2020) on August 14, 2024. The court found sufficient prima facie material that Jadhav, as head of an organized crime syndicate, participated in extortion, criminal intimidation, and threats against a complainant regarding a land dispute, and determined that no reasonable grounds existed to believe him innocent of the serious charges under IPC and MCOCA Act, 1999. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts