Maharashtra State vs Chimutai Mohita Shinde Advocate - Hirwe V.B. — 26/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,160,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHST170004512022

Filing Number

277/2022

Filing Date

28-Jul-2022

Registration No

26/2022

Registration Date

28-Jul-2022

Court

District and Session Court, Vaduj

Judge

3-Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 353,160,504,506
Maharashtra Police Act Section 110/117

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra State

    Adv. AGP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chimutai Mohita Shinde Advocate - Hirwe V.B.

  2. 2.Layana Laxman Shinde

  3. 3.Lavra Laxman Shinde

  4. 4.Amit Lavra Shinde

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge at Vaduj acquitted all four accused persons (Chimutai Mohitya Shinde, Layanya Laxman Shinde, Lavharya Laxman Shinde, and Amit Lavharya Shinde) of charges under Sections 353, 504, 506 r/w 34 of the IPC, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the police witnesses' evidence vague and contradictory, noting no injuries or property damage was sustained, and that the accused did not offer any actual resistance or force to prevent police from discharging their duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  8. 26-Dec-2025

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  9. 21-Nov-2025

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  10. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  11. 10-Oct-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  12. 26-Sep-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  13. 29-Aug-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  14. 25-Jul-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  15. 20-Jun-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  16. 16-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  17. 11-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  18. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  19. 14-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  20. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  21. 20-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  22. 08-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  23. 27-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  24. 30-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  25. 19-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  26. 14-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  27. 10-May-2024

    Hearing

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  28. 05-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  29. 23-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  30. 22-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  31. 09-Nov-2023

    Charge

    Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj

  32. 12-Sep-2023

    Charge

    District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj

  33. 24-Jun-2023

    Charge

    District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj

  34. 23-Jun-2023

    Charge

    District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj

  35. 28-Apr-2023

    Charge

    District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj

  36. 08-Feb-2023

    Charge

    District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj

  37. 23-Dec-2022

    Charge

    District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj

  38. 02-Dec-2022

    Charge

    District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj

  39. 11-Oct-2022

    Charge

    District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj

  40. 19-Aug-2022

    Charge

    District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj

  41. 05-Aug-2022

    Filing of Surety

    District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj

  42. 29-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 28-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2022

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge at Vaduj acquitted all four accused persons (Chimutai Mohitya Shinde, Layanya Laxman Shinde, Lavharya Laxman Shinde, and Amit Lavharya Shinde) of charges under Sections 353, 504, 506 r/w 34 of the IPC, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the police witnesses' evidence vague and contradictory, noting no injuries or property damage was sustained, and that the accused did not offer any actual resistance or force to prevent police from discharging their duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case