Maharashtra State vs Chimutai Mohita Shinde Advocate - Hirwe V.B. — 26/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,160,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHST170004512022
Filing Number
277/2022
Filing Date
28-07-2022
Registration No
26/2022
Registration Date
28-07-2022
Court
District and Session Court, Vaduj
Judge
3-Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maharashtra State
Adv. AGP
Respondent(s)
Chimutai Mohita Shinde Advocate - Hirwe V.B.
Layana Laxman Shinde
Lavra Laxman Shinde
Amit Lavra Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Extra Joint District Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaduj
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge at Vaduj acquitted all four accused persons (Chimutai Mohitya Shinde, Layanya Laxman Shinde, Lavharya Laxman Shinde, and Amit Lavharya Shinde) of charges under Sections 353, 504, 506 r/w 34 of the IPC, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the police witnesses' evidence vague and contradictory, noting no injuries or property damage was sustained, and that the accused did not offer any actual resistance or force to prevent police from discharging their duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge at Vaduj acquitted all four accused persons (Chimutai Mohitya Shinde, Layanya Laxman Shinde, Lavharya Laxman Shinde, and Amit Lavharya Shinde) of charges under Sections 353, 504, 506 r/w 34 of the IPC, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the police witnesses' evidence vague and contradictory, noting no injuries or property damage was sustained, and that the accused did not offer any actual resistance or force to prevent police from discharging their duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts