Shivaji Bhau Pawar vs Dadasaheb Anna Pawar — 7/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order43Rule1. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHST170001192026
e-Filing Number
02-02-2026
Filing Number
72/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court, Vaduj
Judge
1-District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivaji Bhau Pawar
Adv. Jamir Kazi
Respondent(s)
Dadasaheb Anna Pawar
Hanmant Anna pawar
Shashikant Anna Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj
Disposed
Judgment
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 02-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 25-02-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 11-02-2026 | Notice_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Court partially allowed the defendant's appeal against the trial court's interim injunction order. The court found that while the plaintiffs failed to establish joint ownership through partition by metes and bounds, they prima facie established entitlement to joint possession of the agricultural property based on a 1951 compromise decree. Consequently, the court modified the injunction to restrain only the defendant from ousting the plaintiffs from the properties until final suit disposal, rather than granting the broader relief originally sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Court partially allowed the defendant's appeal against the trial court's interim injunction order. The court found that while the plaintiffs failed to establish joint ownership through partition by metes and bounds, they prima facie established entitlement to joint possession of the agricultural property based on a 1951 compromise decree. Consequently, the court modified the injunction to restrain only the defendant from ousting the plaintiffs from the properties until final suit disposal, rather than granting the broader relief originally sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts