Girish Namdev Bhosale vs Maharashtra State Dahiwadi P.S — 19/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHST170000842026
e-Filing Number
17-01-2026
Filing Number
40/2026
Filing Date
19-01-2026
Registration No
19/2026
Registration Date
19-01-2026
Court
District and Session Court, Vaduj
Judge
1-District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Girish Namdev Bhosale
Adv. JADHAV VIJAY DATTU
Namdev Nana Bhosale
Adv. JADHAV VIJAY DATTU
Respondent(s)
Maharashtra State Dahiwadi P.S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Vaduj
Disposed
Judgment
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 04-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 25-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Girish Namdeo Bhosale and another accused charged with assault using deadly weapons (sword and stick) causing head injuries to the complainant, under sections of the Arms Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found the allegations serious, noted a long-standing family dispute, pending weapons recovery, and the risk of witness intimidation since both parties operated adjacent shops, making custodial interrogation necessary for investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Girish Namdeo Bhosale and another accused charged with assault using deadly weapons (sword and stick) causing head injuries to the complainant, under sections of the Arms Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found the allegations serious, noted a long-standing family dispute, pending weapons recovery, and the risk of witness intimidation since both parties operated adjacent shops, making custodial interrogation necessary for investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts