Niranjan Arun Kirloskar vs Anil Sadashiv Nanaware Advocate - Khamkar L.S — 195/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST160031842018
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
Filing Number
327/2018
Filing Date
31-10-2018
Registration No
195/2018
Registration Date
03-11-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Wai
Judge
2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Niranjan Arun Kirloskar
Adv. Yadav R.R
Respondent(s)
Anil Sadashiv Nanaware Advocate - Khamkar L.S
Hearing History
Judge: 2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 19-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 14-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the defendant's application for appointment of a court commissioner under Order 26 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908. The Taluka Superintendent of Land Records, Wai, is appointed to jointly measure the disputed properties (survey no. 661/1/6 and the plaintiff's property) and prepare a detailed map to establish whether encroachment has occurred. The plaintiff must pay the commissioner fees, and both parties are required to assist in the commission work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the defendant's application for appointment of a court commissioner under Order 26 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908. The Taluka Superintendent of Land Records, Wai, is appointed to jointly measure the disputed properties (survey no. 661/1/6 and the plaintiff's property) and prepare a detailed map to establish whether encroachment has occurred. The plaintiff must pay the commissioner fees, and both parties are required to assist in the commission work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts