The State of Maharashtra Thr Wai Police Station Wai vs Ganesh Dattatry Sawant Advocate - Khamkar S.D. — 1059/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 427,447. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHST160018302023

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

08-09-2023

Filing Number

1459/2023

Filing Date

18-10-2023

Registration No

1059/2023

Registration Date

18-10-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Wai

Judge

2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 427,447

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra Thr Wai Police Station Wai

Respondent(s)

Ganesh Dattatry Sawant Advocate - Khamkar S.D.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai

20-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

13-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

06-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

26-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

05-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

23-06-2025
Evidence
24-09-2025
Evidence
05-11-2025
Evidence
15-01-2026
Evidence
13-03-2026
Evidence
20-03-2026
Evidence

This document contains witness testimony (examination-in-chief and cross-examination) in a criminal case against Ganesh Sant, dated 20/03/2026. The witness, a market yard security guard, testified about an incident on 03/05/2023 involving unauthorized hotel operations and damaged fencing at the agricultural produce market committee yard in Baramati, which was subsequently repaired by the accused. The court accepted the testimony as recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document contains witness testimony (examination-in-chief and cross-examination) in a criminal case against Ganesh Sant, dated 20/03/2026. The witness, a market yard security guard, testified about an incident on 03/05/2023 involving unauthorized hotel operations and damaged fencing at the agricultural produce market committee yard in Baramati, which was subsequently repaired by the accused. The court accepted the testimony as recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Wai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case