Pratipa Pratap Babar vs Rupchand Nivrutti Babar — 260/2024

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction against the defendant's construction on disputed property. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as the suit property appeared to be jointly possessed by both parties—the defendant being a co-owner who purchased 1 acre in 2006. Since injunction cannot be granted against a co-owner, and the plaintiffs did not provide documentary evidence of encroachment, the application was dismissed with status quo vacated and each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.