Alka Uttam Gaikwad vs Namdev Bhiku Gaikwad Advocate - Yadav R.R — 419/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST160009042023
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
Filing Number
1615/2023
Filing Date
06-05-2023
Registration No
419/2023
Registration Date
05-06-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Wai
Judge
1-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Alka Uttam Gaikwad
Adv. Bhosale R.R.
Sachin Uttam Gaikwad
Swati Santosh Bhosale
Suhasini Jitendra Vyahalikar
Respondent(s)
Namdev Bhiku Gaikwad Advocate - Yadav R.R
Bhau Sakharam Gaikwad
Shashikant Sakharam Gaikwad
Mahendra Sakharam Gaikwad
Anjana Shivaji Vyahalikar
Nanda Arun More
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 17-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 20-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 19-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 18-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Granted. The court issued a temporary injunction restraining Defendant No. 1 from selling, transferring, or encumbering ancestral properties (agricultural plots Nos. 9, 196, and 680) in Satara district without the final court judgment. The plaintiff established prior possession and rights over the jointly-held ancestral property, and the defendant's threatened unauthorized sale warranted immediate protection to prevent irreparable loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Granted. The court issued a temporary injunction restraining Defendant No. 1 from selling, transferring, or encumbering ancestral properties (agricultural plots Nos. 9, 196, and 680) in Satara district without the final court judgment. The plaintiff established prior possession and rights over the jointly-held ancestral property, and the defendant's threatened unauthorized sale warranted immediate protection to prevent irreparable loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts