State of Maharashtra Through Wai Police Station vs Salman Akbar Khan Advocate - Patil U J — 323/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12 (A). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHST160006502025
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
496/2025
Filing Date
25-06-2025
Registration No
323/2025
Registration Date
25-06-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Wai
Judge
2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Wai Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Salman Akbar Khan Advocate - Patil U J
Hearing History
Judge: 2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 03-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary In this gambling case (FIR No. 323/2025), the court's cross-examination of the police witness revealed significant investigative lapses. The witness admitted that no proper panchnama (official procedure) was conducted regarding the alleged mobile app used for gambling, and failed to identify which specific persons received money from the accused for gambling activities. The court found the investigation defective and the charge sheet conclusions unreliable, effectively undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this gambling case (FIR No. 323/2025), the court's cross-examination of the police witness revealed significant investigative lapses. The witness admitted that no proper panchnama (official procedure) was conducted regarding the alleged mobile app used for gambling, and failed to identify which specific persons received money from the accused for gambling activities. The court found the investigation defective and the charge sheet conclusions unreliable, effectively undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts