State of Maharashtra Through Wai Police Station vs Salman Akbar Khan Advocate - Patil U J — 323/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12 (A). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHST160006502025

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

02nd April 2026

Filing Number

496/2025

Filing Date

25-06-2025

Registration No

323/2025

Registration Date

25-06-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Wai

Judge

2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12 (A)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Wai Police Station

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Salman Akbar Khan Advocate - Patil U J

Hearing History

Judge: 2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai

06-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

13-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

16-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

05-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

03-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

13-02-2026
Evidence

Summary In this gambling case (FIR No. 323/2025), the court's cross-examination of the police witness revealed significant investigative lapses. The witness admitted that no proper panchnama (official procedure) was conducted regarding the alleged mobile app used for gambling, and failed to identify which specific persons received money from the accused for gambling activities. The court found the investigation defective and the charge sheet conclusions unreliable, effectively undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In this gambling case (FIR No. 323/2025), the court's cross-examination of the police witness revealed significant investigative lapses. The witness admitted that no proper panchnama (official procedure) was conducted regarding the alleged mobile app used for gambling, and failed to identify which specific persons received money from the accused for gambling activities. The court found the investigation defective and the charge sheet conclusions unreliable, effectively undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Wai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case