State of Maharashtra Through Wai Police Station vs Salman Akbar Khan Advocate - Patil U J — 323/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12 (A). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 02-Apr-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHST160006502025

Filing Number

496/2025

Filing Date

25-Jun-2025

Registration No

323/2025

Registration Date

25-Jun-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Wai

Judge

2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12 (A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Wai Police Station

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Salman Akbar Khan Advocate - Patil U J

Case History

  1. 02-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai

  3. 13-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    Summary In this gambling case (FIR No. 323/2025), the court's cross-examination of the police witness revealed significant investigative lapses. The witness admitted that no proper panchnama (official procedure) was conducted regarding the alleged mobile app used for gambling, and failed to identify which specific persons received money from the accused for gambling activities. The court found the investigation defective and the charge sheet conclusions unreliable, effectively undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai

  5. 16-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai

  7. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai

  8. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai

  9. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai

  10. 25-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 25-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 323/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In this gambling case (FIR No. 323/2025), the court's cross-examination of the police witness revealed significant investigative lapses. The witness admitted that no proper panchnama (official procedure) was conducted regarding the alleged mobile app used for gambling, and failed to identify which specific persons received money from the accused for gambling activities. The court found the investigation defective and the charge sheet conclusions unreliable, effectively undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case