The State of Maharashtra Thr Bhuinj Police Station Bhuinj vs Dipak Santosh More — 78/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHST160006102024
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
485/2024
Filing Date
05-06-2024
Registration No
78/2024
Registration Date
05-06-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Wai
Judge
2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Thr Bhuinj Police Station Bhuinj
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Dipak Santosh More
Hearing History
Judge: 2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 15-10-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness examination record (साक्ष पुरावा) in a criminal case (FIR 78/2024, Case No. 14) from Wai Court, Satara district, Maharashtra, dated March 15, 2025. The examination records the testimony of a 73-year-old witness regarding a theft of copper water heating equipment from his son-in-law's house, including details of the panchnama (official seizure record) and four photographs of the broken chain and lock found at the scene. The cross-examination reveals the witness has good relations with the complainant and confirms his testimony, while the defense did not conduct further questioning, and the court accepted the complete examination record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness examination record (साक्ष पुरावा) in a criminal case (FIR 78/2024, Case No. 14) from Wai Court, Satara district, Maharashtra, dated March 15, 2025. The examination records the testimony of a 73-year-old witness regarding a theft of copper water heating equipment from his son-in-law's house, including details of the panchnama (official seizure record) and four photographs of the broken chain and lock found at the scene. The cross-examination reveals the witness has good relations with the complainant and confirms his testimony, while the defense did not conduct further questioning, and the court accepted the complete examination record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts