Vaishali Dattatraya Bodake vs Harubai Vitthal Jamdade Advocate - Khamkar S.D. — 80/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST160005102017
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
Filing Number
140/2017
Filing Date
02-05-2017
Registration No
80/2017
Registration Date
06-05-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Wai
Judge
2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vaishali Dattatraya Bodake
Adv. Yadav R.R
Respondent(s)
Harubai Vitthal Jamdade Advocate - Khamkar S.D.
Jaising Vitthal Jamdade
Sukhasini Rajendra Jagtap
Ravindra Laxman Rajpure
Rajendra Laxman Rajapure
Sitabai Rajendra Rajapure
Babai Laxman Rajapure
Saihyadri Builders And Devolopers
Yogesh Shrirang Vare
Sadanand Kisan Mandhare
Dhananjay Kisan Mandhare
Santosh Dhondiba Tupe
Amar Maruti Jamdade
Hearing History
Judge: 2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 30-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 09-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 21-11-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 14-11-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition is allowed. The court ordered that the petitioner's application be granted, and the cost of the petition shall be borne by the respondents numbered 1 to 3. The court found that the petitioner has a right to seek the relief as the first right holder, and the respondents failed to establish that granting the petition would cause them irreparable harm or prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition is allowed. The court ordered that the petitioner's application be granted, and the cost of the petition shall be borne by the respondents numbered 1 to 3. The court found that the petitioner has a right to seek the relief as the first right holder, and the respondents failed to establish that granting the petition would cause them irreparable harm or prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts