Prithaviraj Malojirao Pisal Deshmukha vs Chandrakant Laxman Gole — 254/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHST160004682022
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
381/2022
Filing Date
01-04-2022
Registration No
254/2022
Registration Date
01-04-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Wai
Judge
2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prithaviraj Malojirao Pisal Deshmukha
Adv. Vanarase P.J
Respondent(s)
Chandrakant Laxman Gole
Hearing History
Judge: 2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 21-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-10-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In SCC No.254/2022 (Prudhviraj Vs. Chandrakant), the accused's application for adjournment was rejected by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wai District Satara on 25/07/2025. The accused filed the adjournment application at 1:30 PM after the matter was already called, citing inability of his known person to reach court. The court rejected the application as the matter had already been called and a date (12.09.2025) was already fixed, making adjournment inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In SCC No.254/2022 (Prudhviraj Vs. Chandrakant), the accused's application for adjournment was rejected by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wai District Satara on 25/07/2025. The accused filed the adjournment application at 1:30 PM after the matter was already called, citing inability of his known person to reach court. The court rejected the application as the matter had already been called and a date (12.09.2025) was already fixed, making adjournment inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts