Gopal Dadaso Pawar vs Yashwant Narayan Babar Advocate - S.K.Igave — 900151/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST160002132012
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
900151/2012
Filing Date
27-01-2012
Registration No
900151/2012
Registration Date
27-01-2012
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Wai
Judge
1-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gopal Dadaso Pawar
Adv. Shinde A.K.
Respondent(s)
Yashwant Narayan Babar Advocate - S.K.Igave
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C Wai
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 06-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 02-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 12-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 21-11-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The defendant's application seeking to frame a preliminary issue on res-judicata (claim that the suit is barred by a previous judgment) was rejected. The court found that since the reliefs sought in the current suit differ from the previous suit (which only sought injunction), and the defendant had not yet filed a written statement, the res-judicata issue should be decided along with other issues during trial rather than as a preliminary matter. Both parties are directed to expedite the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The defendant's application seeking to frame a preliminary issue on res-judicata (claim that the suit is barred by a previous judgment) was rejected. The court found that since the reliefs sought in the current suit differ from the previous suit (which only sought injunction), and the defendant had not yet filed a written statement, the res-judicata issue should be decided along with other issues during trial rather than as a preliminary matter. Both parties are directed to expedite the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts