Anandrao Govind Wagh, etc.7 vs Rukmini Vitthal Kumbhar, etc.1 Advocate - Pawar D.L. — 163/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Injunction. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST150013122018
Filing Number
1300175/2018
Filing Date
04-Jul-2018
Registration No
163/2018
Registration Date
04-Jul-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Vaduj
Judge
1-Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anandrao Govind Wagh, etc.7
Adv. Shinde D.S.
-
2.Patangrao Govind Wagh
Adv. Shinde D.S.
-
3.Chandrakant Govind Wagh
-
4.Mohan Tukaram Wagh
Adv. Shinde D.S.
-
5.Machindra Tukaram Wagh
Adv. Shinde D.S.
-
6.Lalasaheb Tukaram Wagh
Adv. Shinde D.S.
-
7.Gorakh Arjun Wagh
Adv. Shinde D.S.
-
8.Suresh Arjun Wagh
Adv. Shinde D.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rukmini Vitthal Kumbhar, etc.1 Advocate - Pawar D.L.
-
2.Mangesh Rajaram Kumbhar
Case History
-
28-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
23-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
19-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
15-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
30-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
18-Oct-2024
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
14-Aug-2024
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
23-Jul-2024
Order on Exh
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
19-Jun-2024
Order on Exh
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
18-Apr-2024
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
20-Mar-2024
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
02-Feb-2024
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
19-Dec-2023
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
23-Nov-2023
Additional Issues
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
13-Oct-2023
Additional W.S.
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
08-Sep-2023
Additional W.S.
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
04-Aug-2023
Amended Plaint
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
07-Jul-2023
Amended Plaint
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
09-Jun-2023
Order on Exh
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
26-Apr-2023
Order on Exh
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
27-Mar-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
22-Feb-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
18-Jan-2023
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
14-Dec-2022
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
19-Nov-2022
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
04-Nov-2022
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
04-Oct-2022
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
20-Aug-2022
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
14-Jun-2022
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
17-Mar-2022
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
11-Feb-2022
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
09-Dec-2021
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
26-Oct-2021
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
08-Sep-2021
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
23-Jul-2021
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
15-Jun-2021
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
08-Apr-2021
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
15-Mar-2021
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
11-Jan-2021
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
26-Oct-2020
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
13-Jul-2020
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
07-Apr-2020
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
05-Feb-2020
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
17-Dec-2019
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
24-Oct-2019
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
16-Sep-2019
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
02-Aug-2019
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
24-Jun-2019
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
20-Apr-2019
Issues
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
25-Feb-2019
Issues
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
20-Dec-2018
Issues
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
13-Nov-2018
Order on T.I.View PDF
Summary This is a civil property dispute case (RRM No. 163/2018) decided by the Vaduj District Court in Marathi. The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal and upheld the respondents' rights over the disputed property. The court found that the respondents were entitled to possess the land based on gram panchayat (village council) records showing them as legitimate landholders, and the petitioner failed to establish clear ownership or prior possession. The court rejected the petitioner's claim of unauthorized encroachment by the respondents and dismissed all relief sought in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Nov-2018
Issues
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
31-Oct-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
16-Oct-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
08-Oct-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
03-Oct-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
17-Sep-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
16-Aug-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
01-Aug-2018
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
16-Jul-2018
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vaduj
-
07-Jul-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jul-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 163/2018
Summary This is a civil property dispute case (RRM No. 163/2018) decided by the Vaduj District Court in Marathi. The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal and upheld the respondents' rights over the disputed property. The court found that the respondents were entitled to possess the land based on gram panchayat (village council) records showing them as legitimate landholders, and the petitioner failed to establish clear ownership or prior possession. The court rejected the petitioner's claim of unauthorized encroachment by the respondents and dismissed all relief sought in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts