Mohmad Jakir Kureshi vs Revan Dilip Godambe — 79/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420, 406. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHST140007902024
Next Hearing
28th March 2026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2024
Filing Number
691/2024
Filing Date
24-02-2024
Registration No
79/2024
Registration Date
26-02-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Phaltan
Judge
4-5th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohmad Jakir Kureshi
Adv. SAGAR DESHPANDE
Respondent(s)
Revan Dilip Godambe
Hearing History
Judge: 4-5th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 20-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 31-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the complainant's petition under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. seeking FIR registration against the accused for alleged cheating involving a vehicle licensing agreement and dishonored cheque. The court found that no complex investigation was required as facts were within the complainant's knowledge and custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The case has been put up for verification of the complainant, and the complainant retains the option to file a private complaint instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the complainant's petition under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. seeking FIR registration against the accused for alleged cheating involving a vehicle licensing agreement and dishonored cheque. The court found that no complex investigation was required as facts were within the complainant's knowledge and custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The case has been put up for verification of the complainant, and the complainant retains the option to file a private complaint instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts