Mohmad Jakir Kureshi vs Revan Dilip Godambe — 79/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420, 406. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 28-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHST140007902024

e-Filing Number

21-02-2024

Filing Number

691/2024

Filing Date

24-Feb-2024

Registration No

79/2024

Registration Date

26-Feb-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Phaltan

Judge

4-5th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420, 406

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohmad Jakir Kureshi

    Adv. SAGAR DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Revan Dilip Godambe

Case History

  1. 28-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    5th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    5th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    5th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    5th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  6. 31-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  9. 25-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  10. 04-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  11. 28-Aug-2025

    Report

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  12. 03-Jul-2025

    Report

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  13. 31-May-2025

    Report

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  14. 11-Apr-2025

    Report

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  15. 17-Mar-2025

    Report

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  16. 15-Feb-2025

    Report

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  17. 27-Dec-2024

    Report

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  18. 28-Nov-2024

    Report

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  19. 06-Nov-2024

    Report

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  20. 03-Oct-2024

    Report

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  21. 23-Aug-2024

    Report

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  22. 18-Jul-2024

    Report

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  23. 14-Jun-2024

    Report

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  24. 12-Jun-2024

    Report

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  25. 03-May-2024

    Report

    5th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  26. 18-Apr-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court rejected the complainant's petition under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. seeking FIR registration against the accused for alleged cheating involving a vehicle licensing agreement and dishonored cheque. The court found that no complex investigation was required as facts were within the complainant's knowledge and custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The case has been put up for verification of the complainant, and the complainant retains the option to file a private complaint instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  27. 18-Apr-2024

    Verification

    5th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  28. 05-Apr-2024

    Order

    5th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  29. 14-Mar-2024

    Order

    5th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Phaltan

  30. 28-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 24-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 79/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the complainant's petition under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. seeking FIR registration against the accused for alleged cheating involving a vehicle licensing agreement and dishonored cheque. The court found that no complex investigation was required as facts were within the complainant's knowledge and custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The case has been put up for verification of the complainant, and the complainant retains the option to file a private complaint instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case