Macchindranath Dagadu Salunkhe vs Shamrao Dnyanu Salunkhe — 276/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39Rule1. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHST130015222025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

13th April 2026

e-Filing Number

18-12-2025

Filing Number

457/2025

Filing Date

19-12-2025

Registration No

276/2025

Registration Date

19-12-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Patan

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39Rule1

Petitioner(s)

Macchindranath Dagadu Salunkhe

Adv. MARUTI NANGARE

Ankush Anna Salunkhe

Adv. MARUTI NANGARE

Respondent(s)

Shamrao Dnyanu Salunkhe

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

20-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

06-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

21-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

17-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

19-12-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from carrying out permanent construction on the disputed property and from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession. Both parties are directed to maintain status quo of the suit property until the defendants are heard on the returnable date. Notice of the application has been issued to the defendants, and the court found prima facie that allowing construction to proceed would alter the property and adversely affect the parties' rights in this partition and possession suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from carrying out permanent construction on the disputed property and from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession. Both parties are directed to maintain status quo of the suit property until the defendants are heard on the returnable date. Notice of the application has been issued to the defendants, and the court found prima facie that allowing construction to proceed would alter the property and adversely affect the parties' rights in this partition and possession suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Patan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case