Macchindranath Dagadu Salunkhe vs Shamrao Dnyanu Salunkhe — 276/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39Rule1. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST130015222025
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
18-12-2025
Filing Number
457/2025
Filing Date
19-12-2025
Registration No
276/2025
Registration Date
19-12-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patan
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Macchindranath Dagadu Salunkhe
Adv. MARUTI NANGARE
Ankush Anna Salunkhe
Adv. MARUTI NANGARE
Respondent(s)
Shamrao Dnyanu Salunkhe
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 21-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 17-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from carrying out permanent construction on the disputed property and from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession. Both parties are directed to maintain status quo of the suit property until the defendants are heard on the returnable date. Notice of the application has been issued to the defendants, and the court found prima facie that allowing construction to proceed would alter the property and adversely affect the parties' rights in this partition and possession suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from carrying out permanent construction on the disputed property and from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession. Both parties are directed to maintain status quo of the suit property until the defendants are heard on the returnable date. Notice of the application has been issued to the defendants, and the court found prima facie that allowing construction to proceed would alter the property and adversely affect the parties' rights in this partition and possession suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts