Narayan Govind Khamkar etc. 2 vs Sarpanch, Grampanchyat Awarde etc. 5 Advocate - G T Jadhav — 7000290/2012
Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST130007652012
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
7000290/2012
Filing Date
21-09-2012
Registration No
7000290/2012
Registration Date
24-09-2012
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patan
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Petitioner(s)
Narayan Govind Khamkar etc. 2
Adv. Palekar S R
Tukaram Dhula Khamkar
Adv. S. S. Shinde
Respondent(s)
Sarpanch, Grampanchyat Awarde etc. 5 Advocate - G T Jadhav
Hanmant Hindurao Khamkar
Adv. T. D. Ghadage
Dilip Dattu Sonavale
Adv. T. D. Ghadage
Ramchandra Sitaram Khamkar
Adv. T. D. Ghadage
Sanjay Mugutrao Khamkar
Adv. T. D. Ghadage
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application to condone delay in bringing legal representatives of deceased plaintiff no. 2 on record is allowed. The court found sufficient cause for the delay (plaintiff's death on 12.06.2020, legal representatives' residence in Mumbai, unavailability of documents, and lack of knowledge about the suit), recognizing that the right to sue survives in this perpetual injunction suit. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 300/- to be paid to the defendants as a penalty for the delay caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application to condone delay in bringing legal representatives of deceased plaintiff no. 2 on record is allowed. The court found sufficient cause for the delay (plaintiff's death on 12.06.2020, legal representatives' residence in Mumbai, unavailability of documents, and lack of knowledge about the suit), recognizing that the right to sue survives in this perpetual injunction suit. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 300/- to be paid to the defendants as a penalty for the delay caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts