Nitin Madhukar Devalekar vs Bajrang Bapu Lambor Advocate - Matekar S.K — 7000284/2012
Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST130007632012
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
Filing Number
7000284/2012
Filing Date
14-09-2012
Registration No
7000284/2012
Registration Date
17-09-2012
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patan
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Petitioner(s)
Nitin Madhukar Devalekar
Adv. Jadhav D.P
Shrirang Arvind Nulkar
Adv. S. V. Pendharkar
Respondent(s)
Bajrang Bapu Lambor Advocate - Matekar S.K
Anand Ramchandra Madiwale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 23-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 19-12-2025 | Hearing |
| 28-10-2025 | Issues |
| 29-08-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Maharashtra High Court order (dated 11/12/2013) in Case No. 284/2012, Revision Application No. 5. The court dismissed the plaintiff's revision petition, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish ownership or legal right to the disputed property. The court held that Defendant 1 is the rightful owner and occupant of the property, as evidenced by a 1995 document transferring possession to Defendants 1 and 2, and rejected the plaintiff's claims regarding adverse possession and damages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Maharashtra High Court order (dated 11/12/2013) in Case No. 284/2012, Revision Application No. 5. The court dismissed the plaintiff's revision petition, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish ownership or legal right to the disputed property. The court held that Defendant 1 is the rightful owner and occupant of the property, as evidenced by a 1995 document transferring possession to Defendants 1 and 2, and rejected the plaintiff's claims regarding adverse possession and damages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts