Vilas Laxman Bartakke vs Vidhyatai Ravishankar Relekar Advocate - Jadhav D.P — 92/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section injuction. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST130007132017
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
158/2017
Filing Date
11-08-2017
Registration No
92/2017
Registration Date
16-08-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patan
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vilas Laxman Bartakke
Adv. Jagadale A. U.
Respondent(s)
Vidhyatai Ravishankar Relekar Advocate - Jadhav D.P
Subhash Sadashiv Bartakke(Legal Heir)
Prakash Sadashiv Bartakke
Sunil Sadashiv Bartakke(Legal Heir)
Anil Sadashiv Bartakke
Ganpati Laxman Bartakke
Ashok Anant Patil
Satish Hanmant Mane
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 15-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 24-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed Defendant No. 1's application to amend the written statement in this partition and declaration suit. The amendment adds paragraph 14A elaborating on the family arrangement regarding the suit property and provides additional genealogical details regarding alleged heirs, along with reiteration of existing objections. The court found that the proposed amendment amplifies existing defenses rather than introducing wholly new claims, and since cross-examination had not yet commenced, the amendment was necessary for complete adjudication. Defendant No. 1 must file the amended written statement within 14 days after paying costs of Rs. 500 to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed Defendant No. 1's application to amend the written statement in this partition and declaration suit. The amendment adds paragraph 14A elaborating on the family arrangement regarding the suit property and provides additional genealogical details regarding alleged heirs, along with reiteration of existing objections. The court found that the proposed amendment amplifies existing defenses rather than introducing wholly new claims, and since cross-examination had not yet commenced, the amendment was necessary for complete adjudication. Defendant No. 1 must file the amended written statement within 14 days after paying costs of Rs. 500 to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts