Archana Narayan Gujar vs Sandip Ananda Gujar Others Advocate - Janugade A.R — 211/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST130006792022
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
Filing Number
251/2022
Filing Date
14-06-2022
Registration No
211/2022
Registration Date
14-06-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patan
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Archana Narayan Gujar
Adv. Patil H.D.
Respondent(s)
Sandip Ananda Gujar Others Advocate - Janugade A.R
Swati Laxman Malusare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 17-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 07-11-2025 | Hearing |
| 29-08-2025 | Hearing |
| 29-07-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: R.D.M.Cr. 211/2022 | Order Date: 20/12/2023 | Court: Civil Court, Patan Outcome: The petition (Order 39 Rule 1, CPC 1908) seeking temporary relief/injunction against Respondent No. 1 has been DISMISSED. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case of misuse of power of attorney or wrongful sale of the property, as no preliminary evidence or credible documents supporting these allegations were placed on record. Accordingly, the court held that the petitioner lacks sufficient grounds for interim relief and rejected the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: R.D.M.Cr. 211/2022 | Order Date: 20/12/2023 | Court: Civil Court, Patan Outcome: The petition (Order 39 Rule 1, CPC 1908) seeking temporary relief/injunction against Respondent No. 1 has been DISMISSED. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case of misuse of power of attorney or wrongful sale of the property, as no preliminary evidence or credible documents supporting these allegations were placed on record. Accordingly, the court held that the petitioner lacks sufficient grounds for interim relief and rejected the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts