Bandu Sakharam Kadam vs Shankar Ramchandra Patil Advocate - Bhise R.K — 63/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST130005842020
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
Filing Number
85/2020
Filing Date
28-07-2020
Registration No
63/2020
Registration Date
28-07-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patan
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bandu Sakharam Kadam
Adv. Janugade A.R
Indubai Bandu Kadam
Respondent(s)
Shankar Ramchandra Patil Advocate - Bhise R.K
Jagubai Shankar Patil
Balasaheb Urfa Babaso Shankar Patil
Sunanda Babaso Patil
Akshay Babaso Patil
Tai Babaso Patil
Tejaswaini Babaso Patil
Pandurang Jagannath Patil
Vimal Pandurang Patil
Uttam Ananda Kadam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 14-10-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-09-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 29-07-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Property boundary dispute (R.D.M.N. 63/2020) - Patan District Court Outcome: The petition filed by the defendant is partially allowed. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's property rights over plot 220/2, while rejecting the defendant's request to prevent the plaintiff from constructing on the western boundary of their own property (plot 219). The court found that the plaintiff has legitimate ownership rights and cannot be prevented from construction activities within their legal boundaries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Property boundary dispute (R.D.M.N. 63/2020) - Patan District Court Outcome: The petition filed by the defendant is partially allowed. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's property rights over plot 220/2, while rejecting the defendant's request to prevent the plaintiff from constructing on the western boundary of their own property (plot 219). The court found that the plaintiff has legitimate ownership rights and cannot be prevented from construction activities within their legal boundaries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts