Ananda Namdeo Shinde vs Shankar Vishnu Shinde Advocate - Panval U.V — 700058/2009
Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 31st March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST130005482009
Next Hearing
31st March 2026
Filing Number
700058/2009
Filing Date
16-02-2009
Registration No
700058/2009
Registration Date
20-04-2009
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patan
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Petitioner(s)
Ananda Namdeo Shinde
Adv. Matekar S.K
Tai Namdeo Shinde
Lata Ananda Shinde
Respondent(s)
Shankar Vishnu Shinde Advocate - Panval U.V
Shamrao Vishnu Shinde
Sulabai Amrut Chavan
Mangala Lalaso Padval
Indubai Govind Pawar
Shilatai Ramchandra Dhane
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 19-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Petition Allowed - Ex-parte Order Overturned The court allowed the petition filed by Defendants 1A and 1K seeking to set aside the ex-parte order passed against them. The court found their explanation regarding non-availability of documents and inability to provide timely instructions to counsel as reasonable, and in the interests of justice, set aside the ex-parte order and restored their right to present their defense on merits. The court also dismissed the plaintiff's counter-objections and plea for costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Petition Allowed - Ex-parte Order Overturned The court allowed the petition filed by Defendants 1A and 1K seeking to set aside the ex-parte order passed against them. The court found their explanation regarding non-availability of documents and inability to provide timely instructions to counsel as reasonable, and in the interests of justice, set aside the ex-parte order and restored their right to present their defense on merits. The court also dismissed the plaintiff's counter-objections and plea for costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts