Ganpati Kondi Sonawale vs Aaba Jagu Sonawale Advocate - Mane A.S — 700129/2010
Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST130004802010
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
Filing Number
700129/2010
Filing Date
28-06-2010
Registration No
700129/2010
Registration Date
09-07-2010
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patan
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Petitioner(s)
Ganpati Kondi Sonawale
Adv. Gaikwad P.K
Respondent(s)
Aaba Jagu Sonawale Advocate - Mane A.S
Aappa Genu Sonawale
Sambhaji Bapu Sonawale
Hanmant Dadu Sonawale
Jayshing Dadu Sonawale
Mansing Dadu Sonawale
Vilas Dadu Sonawale
Dinkar Shankar Sonawale
Vinod Tanaji Sonawale
Amol Mohan Sonawale
Rahul Sonyaba Sonawale
Ranjana Chandrakant Sonawale
Baijabai Krushanat Bhise
Suwarna Balu Awale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 06-03-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 23-02-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 06-01-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 20-11-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed Defendant No. 33's application to amend his Written Statement and Counter-claim in a property partition suit, permitting him to add genealogical details, challenge a Gift Deed executed during litigation, and raise the defense of limitation based on newly translated historical documents in Modi script. The amendment was granted despite an 8-year delay because the defendant demonstrated due diligence in procuring and translating archaic records, and the amendments were essential for determining the true controversy, with the trial not yet advanced beyond the plaintiff's affidavit stage. Defendant No. 33 was ordered to pay ₹1,000 in compensatory costs to the plaintiff and file the amended pleading within 7 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed Defendant No. 33's application to amend his Written Statement and Counter-claim in a property partition suit, permitting him to add genealogical details, challenge a Gift Deed executed during litigation, and raise the defense of limitation based on newly translated historical documents in Modi script. The amendment was granted despite an 8-year delay because the defendant demonstrated due diligence in procuring and translating archaic records, and the amendments were essential for determining the true controversy, with the trial not yet advanced beyond the plaintiff's affidavit stage. Defendant No. 33 was ordered to pay ₹1,000 in compensatory costs to the plaintiff and file the amended pleading within 7 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts