Sudhir Dhondji Kadam vs Purshotam Dhondaji Kadam — 100/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39rule1. Status: Ex_Party Hearing. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST130004742025
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
e-Filing Number
11-04-2025
Filing Number
169/2025
Filing Date
11-04-2025
Registration No
100/2025
Registration Date
17-04-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patan
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sudhir Dhondji Kadam
Adv. KISHOR KADAM
Respondent(s)
Purshotam Dhondaji Kadam
Anandrao Dhondaji Kadam 3.
Pradip Ganpat Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan
Ex_Party Hearing
Ex_Party Hearing
Ex_Party Hearing
Ex_Party Hearing
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Ex_Party Hearing |
| 09-02-2026 | Ex_Party Hearing |
| 19-12-2025 | Ex_Party Hearing |
| 04-12-2025 | Ex_Party Hearing |
| 02-12-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The defendants' application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was rejected. The court found the application premature as issues had not yet been framed and evidence had not begun, and determined that the dispute concerned possession rather than boundaries, making a local investigation unnecessary at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The defendants' application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was rejected. The court found the application premature as issues had not yet been framed and evidence had not begun, and determined that the dispute concerned possession rather than boundaries, making a local investigation unnecessary at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts