Sudhir Dhondji Kadam vs Purshotam Dhondaji Kadam — 100/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39rule1. Status: Ex_Party Hearing. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

Ex_Party Hearing Next hearing 06-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHST130004742025

e-Filing Number

11-04-2025

Filing Number

169/2025

Filing Date

11-Apr-2025

Registration No

100/2025

Registration Date

17-Apr-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Patan

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sudhir Dhondji Kadam

    Adv. KISHOR KADAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Purshotam Dhondaji Kadam

  2. 2.Anandrao Dhondaji Kadam 3.

  3. 3.Pradip Ganpat Jadhav

Case History

  1. 06-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

  4. 19-Dec-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

  5. 04-Dec-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

  6. 02-Dec-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

  7. 21-Nov-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The defendants' application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was rejected. The court found the application premature as issues had not yet been framed and evidence had not begun, and determined that the dispute concerned possession rather than boundaries, making a local investigation unnecessary at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

  11. 11-Sep-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

  12. 08-Aug-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

  13. 23-Jun-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

  14. 02-May-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

  15. 19-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 11-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The defendants' application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was rejected. The court found the application premature as issues had not yet been framed and evidence had not begun, and determined that the dispute concerned possession rather than boundaries, making a local investigation unnecessary at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case