Rudreshwar Gra. B. Sheti Sah. Patsanstha Marya. Tarfe Anandrao Baburao Udugade vs Bharat Lahu Desai Advocate - Ghadge P.K. — 73/2019

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHST130002852019

Arguments

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

Filing Number

248/2019

Filing Date

26-03-2019

Registration No

73/2019

Registration Date

26-03-2019

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Patan

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Rudreshwar Gra. B. Sheti Sah. Patsanstha Marya. Tarfe Anandrao Baburao Udugade

Adv. Ghadge A.D

Respondent(s)

Bharat Lahu Desai Advocate - Ghadge P.K.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

20-03-2026

Arguments

06-03-2026

Arguments

30-01-2026

Arguments

05-12-2025

Arguments

07-11-2025

Defence Evidence

Interim Orders

24-01-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application (Exh.72) is allowed. The court permitted the complainant to adduce documentary evidence regarding the original Resolution during re-examination of witness CW-1, as per the law of evidence, with the accused retaining the right to cross-examine thereafter. The court rejected the accused's objection about secondary evidence and ruled that document admissibility objections must be decided at the time of evidence presentation rather than final arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application (Exh.72) is allowed. The court permitted the complainant to adduce documentary evidence regarding the original Resolution during re-examination of witness CW-1, as per the law of evidence, with the accused retaining the right to cross-examine thereafter. The court rejected the accused's objection about secondary evidence and ruled that document admissibility objections must be decided at the time of evidence presentation rather than final arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Patan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case