Mahavir Daji @ Dajiram Bangar vs Chandrakant Daji @ Dajiram Bangar Advocate - Khasbage P. A. — 11/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Declaration. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST120000662022
Filing Number
19/2022
Filing Date
31-01-2022
Registration No
11/2022
Registration Date
31-01-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mhaswad
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Mhaswad
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahavir Daji @ Dajiram Bangar
Adv. Shete S.R.
Respondent(s)
Chandrakant Daji @ Dajiram Bangar Advocate - Khasbage P. A.
Dilip Daji @ Dajiram Bangar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Mhaswad
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Compromise
Compromise
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 20-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 13-12-2025 | Compromise |
| 13-09-2025 | Compromise |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Civil Judge dismissed the suit in default for want of steps, finding that the plaintiff and his advocate were absent despite multiple court dates since 2022 and failed to take any effective action to progress the matter. The court reasoned that the plaintiff's consistent absence, lack of adjournment application, and inaction since 2022 demonstrated a loss of interest in the suit, making it purposeless to keep the matter pending. No costs were awarded against either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Civil Judge dismissed the suit in default for want of steps, finding that the plaintiff and his advocate were absent despite multiple court dates since 2022 and failed to take any effective action to progress the matter. The court reasoned that the plaintiff's consistent absence, lack of adjournment application, and inaction since 2022 demonstrated a loss of interest in the suit, making it purposeless to keep the matter pending. No costs were awarded against either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts