Mahavir Daji @ Dajiram Bangar vs Chandrakant Daji @ Dajiram Bangar Advocate - Khasbage P. A. — 11/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Declaration. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHST120000662022

Case disposed

Filing Number

19/2022

Filing Date

31-01-2022

Registration No

11/2022

Registration Date

31-01-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mhaswad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Mhaswad

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Declaration

Petitioner(s)

Mahavir Daji @ Dajiram Bangar

Adv. Shete S.R.

Respondent(s)

Chandrakant Daji @ Dajiram Bangar Advocate - Khasbage P. A.

Dilip Daji @ Dajiram Bangar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Mhaswad

06-03-2026

Disposed

26-02-2026

Dismissal Order

20-02-2026

Dismissal Order

13-12-2025

Compromise

13-09-2025

Compromise

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Civil Judge dismissed the suit in default for want of steps, finding that the plaintiff and his advocate were absent despite multiple court dates since 2022 and failed to take any effective action to progress the matter. The court reasoned that the plaintiff's consistent absence, lack of adjournment application, and inaction since 2022 demonstrated a loss of interest in the suit, making it purposeless to keep the matter pending. No costs were awarded against either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Civil Judge dismissed the suit in default for want of steps, finding that the plaintiff and his advocate were absent despite multiple court dates since 2022 and failed to take any effective action to progress the matter. The court reasoned that the plaintiff's consistent absence, lack of adjournment application, and inaction since 2022 demonstrated a loss of interest in the suit, making it purposeless to keep the matter pending. No costs were awarded against either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mhaswad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case