Vaibhav Rajiv More vs jyotiram chandrakant pawar — 106/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST110005002024
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
10-12-2024
Filing Number
158/2024
Filing Date
12-12-2024
Registration No
106/2024
Registration Date
12-12-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Medha
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vaibhav Rajiv More
Adv. PRAFULLA RAVINDRA CHAVAN
Bhushan Rajiv More
Adv. PRAFULLA RAVINDRA CHAVAN
Abhishek Rajiv More
Adv. PRAFULLA RAVINDRA CHAVAN
chaya baban sabale
Adv. PRAFULLA RAVINDRA CHAVAN
Respondent(s)
jyotiram chandrakant pawar
kranti sandip rajpure
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 20-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 09-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 02-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted an ex-parte temporary injunction restraining the defendants from constructing a compound wall on the disputed 10 ft. road property in Satara district, which the plaintiffs rely upon as their sole access to their houses. A show cause notice has been issued to the defendants returnable on 20.12.2024, requiring them to explain why the injunction should not be continued further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted an ex-parte temporary injunction restraining the defendants from constructing a compound wall on the disputed 10 ft. road property in Satara district, which the plaintiffs rely upon as their sole access to their houses. A show cause notice has been issued to the defendants returnable on 20.12.2024, requiring them to explain why the injunction should not be continued further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts