Babasaheb Dinkar Bhise vs Gramsevak Grampachyat Humgoan tal jaoli — 32/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section injuction. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST110001442019
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
Filing Number
42/2019
Filing Date
27-04-2019
Registration No
32/2019
Registration Date
27-04-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Medha
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Babasaheb Dinkar Bhise
Adv. Bhise B D
Respondent(s)
Gramsevak Grampachyat Humgoan tal jaoli
Sarpach Grampachayat Humgaon
Adv. self
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 08-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 10-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 03-09-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The suit filed by the plaintiff seeking perpetual injunction against the defendant has been dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 9 Rule 8 of the CPC. The plaintiff and advocate were repeatedly absent from hearings scheduled between October 2019 and January 2020, failed to argue the matter despite multiple opportunities, and provided no explanation for their absence. The court found the plaintiff had lost interest in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The suit filed by the plaintiff seeking perpetual injunction against the defendant has been dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 9 Rule 8 of the CPC. The plaintiff and advocate were repeatedly absent from hearings scheduled between October 2019 and January 2020, failed to argue the matter despite multiple opportunities, and provided no explanation for their absence. The court found the plaintiff had lost interest in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts